Optimizare structurala

Optimizarea costa; faptul ca am ajuns la o solutie optima de consum insemeamna ca am petrecut un timp important pentru a gasi solutia; ca raspund pentru ea; acest lucru costa bani; in constructii rar ne mai intalnim cu prefabricate, cu proiecte multiplicate la infinit, din sertar; chiar daca copy-paste functioneaza la computer, nu functioneaza in lumea reala; nu se aplica; nimeni nu mai vrea o casa la fel ca a vecinului; degeaba ne-a ajutat tehnologia sa putem replica la infinit invataturile inaintasilor; acum, pentru a exista pe piata trebuie sa inventezi, zilnic, ceva nou!
cititi aici: http://vplevris.com/pdf_files/publications/J_07.pdf
Iata pe acest site ce nume prestigioase, din intreaga lume, se preocupa de problemele optimizarii...

Incercati sa cititi unul din articole:.....surpriza!......costa bani....

http://www.ijsmdo.org/#top

1. G.I. Schueller, Computational stochastic mechanics – re-

cent advances, Comp. & Struct. 79, 2225–2234 (2001)

2. K.-H. Lee, G.-J. Park, Robust optimization considering

tolerances of design variables. Comput. Struct. 79, 77–86

(2001)

3. A. Messac, A. Ismail-Yahaya, Multiobjective robust design

using physical programming. Struct. Multidiscip. O. 23,

357–371 (2002)

4. Hans-Georg Beyer, Bernhard Sendhoff, Robust optimiza-

tion – A comprehensive survey. Comput. Method. Appl.

M. 196, 3190–3218 (2007)

5. M. Papadrakakis, N.D. Lagaros, Reliability-based struc-

tural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo

simulation. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 191, 3491–3507

(2002)

6. X. Qu, R.T. Haftka, S. Venkataraman, Deterministic and

Reliability-Based Optimization of Composite Laminates

for Cryogenic Environments. AIAA Journal 41, 2029–

2036 (2003)

7. M. Allen, K. Maute, Reliability-based shape optimization

of structures undergoing fluid-structure interaction phe-

nomena. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 194 (30-33), 3472–

3495 (2005)

8. J.S. Kong, D.M. Frangopol, Life-cycle reliability-

based maintenance cost optimization of deteriorating

structures with emphasis on bridges. Journal of Structural

Engineering - ASCE 129, 818–828 (2003)

9. Eurocode 3, Design of steel structures, Part1.1: General

rules for buildings, CEN, ENV 1993-1-1/1992

10. V. Pareto, Cours d’´ economique politique, Vol. 1&2,

Rouge, Lausanne (1896)

11. R.T. Marler, J.S. Arora, Survey of Multi-objective

Optimization Methods for Engineering. Structural and

Multidisciplinary Optimization 26, 369–395 (2004)

12. C.A. Coello Coello, An Updated Survey of GA-

Based Multi-objective Optimization Techniques.ACM

Computing Surveys 32, 109–143 (2000)

13. J. Nocedal, S.J. Wright, Numerical Optimization,

Springer, New York (1999)

14. N.D. Lagaros, M. Papadrakakis, G. Kokossalakis,

Structural optimization using evolutionary algorithms.

Comput. Struct. 80, 571–587 (2002)

15. M. Papadrakakis, Y. Tsompanakis, N.D. Lagaros,

Structural shape optimization using Evolution Strategies.

Eng. Optimiz. 31, 515–540 (1999)

16. N.D. Lagaros, V. Plevris, M. Papadrakakis, Multi-

objective design optimization using cascade evolutionary

computations. Comput.Method. Appl.M. 194, 3496–3515

(2005)

17. S.N. Patnaik, R.M. Coroneos, J.D. Guptill, D.A.

Hopkins, Comparative evaluation of different optimization

algorithms for structural design applications.Int.J.

Numer. Meth. Eng. 39, 1761–1774 (1996)

18. D.C. Charmpis, N.D. Lagaros, M. Papadrakakis, Multi-

database exploration of large design spaces in the frame-

work of cascade evolutionary structural sizing optimiza-

tion. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 194 (30-33) 3315–3330

(2005)

19. M.D. McKay, R.J. Beckman, W.J. Conover, Acompar-

ison of three methods for selecting values of input vari-

ables in the analysis of output from a computer code,

Technometrics 21, 239–245 (1979)

20. Eurocode 1 : Basis of design and actions on structures

– Part 2-4: Actions on Structures – Wind actions, CEN,

ENV 1991-2-4, May 1995